Conduct Case MPCC‑2025‑018 Summary

The complainant alleged that the Canadian Forces National Investigation Service (CFNIS) wrongfully investigated and charged him in retaliation for reporting what he described as “covered-up treason, mutiny, and murder,” along with “triad connections” and other matters of national security.

The Canadian Forces Provost Marshal’s (CFPM) Office of Professional Standards (PS) concluded that the complaint was frivolous, vexatious, or made in bad faith. However, it failed to provide sufficient reasons to support this determination. The file was closed with PS noting that the complainant had sent numerous emails deemed “inappropriate” and “not reasonably purposeful.”

After review, the Military Police Complaints Commission (MPCC) agreed with the outcome reached by PS. The complaint was found vexatious, as there was no factual basis upon which the MPCC could proceed with a review. Between February and August 2025, the complainant submitted over 116 emails and numerous voicemails to the MPCC. Despite repeated requests for clarification, the complainant failed to provide any meaningful or relevant information. His submissions consisted largely of repeated assertions, fragmented quotes, Twitter screenshots, irrelevant images, and links to unrelated articles.

The MPCC conducted an analysis of the relevant jurisprudence on vexatious litigation to assess the nature of the complaint. It concluded that the complaint met several established criteria: it served an improper purpose; included unsupported allegations of conspiracy, fraud, and misconduct; and constituted a hopeless proceeding, meaning that many of the remedies sought fell outside of the MPCC’s statutory authority. Despite the serious nature of some of his allegations, the complainant failed to present factual information that would allow the MPCC to consider the matter within its mandate. Accordingly, the complaint was determined to be vexatious, and the file was closed.

Date modified:

2025-10-01