Beamish Public Interest Investigation (MPCC‑2016‑040) – Homepage

Military Police Complaints Commission releases Final Report in Public Interest Investigation into allegations of torture and abuse of former CAF members

Ottawa August 31, 2021 – Following a Public Interest Investigation, the Military Police Complaints Commission has found that a Military Police (MP) conduct complaint regarding the adequacy of a Canadian Forces National Investigation Service (CFNIS) into historical allegations of torture and abuse of former members of the Canadian Armed Forces are not substantiated.

The allegations were made by a participant in training exercises at the Infantry Battle School at Canadian Forces Base (CFB) Wainwright between October 1983 and March 1984. The complainant, Jeffry Beamish, alleged that he and 32 other recruits were stripped naked, placed in small prison cells and sprayed repeatedly with cold water while the window to the cells was kept open during sub-zero temperatures in February. They were also subjected to interrogation under a cold shower that went on for several hours.

The recruits were denied access to food or drink, as well as sanitary and toilet facilities. Mr. Beamish and a number of the former trainees have stated that they now suffer from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder as a result of the exercise.

The complaint was filed with the Military Police Complaints Commission (MPCC) in December 2016. Following a preliminary review of material related to the case, MPCC Chairperson Hilary C. McCormack decided to conduct a Public Interest Investigation (PII) into the complaint in April 2018.

Aside from the allegations of torture and abuse, Mr. Beamish also made four other allegations related to the CFNIS lead investigator’s handling of the initial investigation. The PII determined that all five allegations were unsubstantiated, however the MPCC made five recommendations designed to improve military police investigations and oversight.

The MPCC interviewed 40 witnesses during its investigation, which found that the training exercise took place, more or less as alleged by the complainant. The investigation determined that the exercise was not an officially authorized part of the Battle School training and that it was not in keeping with basic infantry training standards at the time.

The PII determined that a Regional Military Prosecutor advised the CFNIS that charges under the Code of Service Discipline of the National Defence Act would not be possible because of the statute of limitations in force at the time of the exercise. Subsequently, a provincial Crown Attorney in Alberta advised the CFNIS that the case also lacked a reasonable prospect of conviction on charges under the Criminal Code.

“This means that, even if there is some evidence to support the elements of a chargeable offence, the chances of actually proving the case are such that it is not worth the expenditure of judicial resources of proceeding with the case,” said Ms. McCormack. “It does not mean that the prosecutor disagrees that the facts, as alleged, occurred,” she said in releasing the 115 page report. The CFNIS did not pursue the investigation or lay charges after receiving the advice of the provincial crown.

In its Final Report, the Commission made three recommendations to the Canadian Forces Provost Marshal (CFPM) and two to the Minister of National Defence that address a range of issues, including:

• The need for further training for Military Police officers on how they explain charge-laying decisions to complainants;
• The need for Military Police investigators to be transparent in explaining no-charge decisions to victims, including by sharing with them advice from prosecutors, where relevant; and
• That the Minister support the Commission’s access to relevant solicitor-client privileged information in appropriate cases on terms equivalent with those granted to the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

The CFPM has fully accepted two of the three MPCC recommendations addressed to him; while partially accepting the third. At this time, the Commission continues to await a response from the Minister of National Defence to the two recommendations addressed to that office. The Commission intends to re-issue its report once the response from the Minister is received.

“It is hoped that this investigation, in as much as it has vindicated the complainant’s memory and viewpoint, will help to provide him and the other victims with some closure to what was clearly a traumatic event,” said Ms. McCormack. “The criminal justice system is an imperfect institution and one that is not designed for obtaining personal validation or vindication for victims. This is especially true for those who seek recourse after the passage of many years.”

Contact:

Date modified:

2024-12-20