Information Sheet on Public Interest Investigations
This information sheet was prepared for general information purposes and is solely meant to provide an overview of the public interest investigation process by the Military Police Complaints Commission of Canada (MPCC). For more information, please contact the MPCC.
The public interest investigation
A public interest investigation is a process that enables the Military Police Complaints Commission of Canada (MPCC) to make all of its findings public through publishing its full final report following its investigation. This process also enables the MPCC to provide updates to the public when it deems it necessary during the course of its investigation. Furthermore, on the grounds of public interest, the MPCC Chairperson can choose to have a public interest investigation conducted by the MPCC at any time during the processing of a complaint. The public interest investigation process therefore enables the MPCC to investigate a conduct complaint in the first instance when the Chairperson deems it preferable and in the public interest, contrary to the normal process where an investigation is first conducted by the Canadian Forces Provost Marshal.
The steps in the public interest investigation process
An MPCC public interest investigation takes place in six steps, from the receipt of the complaint to the publication of the MPCC final report.
Alternate format
This is an image of a diagram showing the steps involved in a public interest investigation with the Military Police Complaints Commission of Canada (MPCC):
- Step 1: A conduct or interference complaint is filed
- Step 2: The MPCC Chairperson decides to conduct a public interest investigation
- Step 3: The MPCC investigates
- Step 4: The MPCC issues its interim report
- Step 5: The Canadian Forces Provost Marshal or the Chief of Defence Staff or the Deputy Minister provides a notice of action to the MPCC
- Step 6: The MPCC publishes its final report
Step 1 – A conduct or interference complaint is filed
The processing of a complaint as part of a public interest investigation begins with the filing of a conduct or interference complaint.
- Who can file a conduct complaint?
- Anyone, whether a member of the public or a member of the military police, including individuals not directly affected by the subject matter of the complaint, may file a conduct complaint regarding a military police member in the performance of their “policing duties or functions.”
- Who can file an interference complaint?
- Any military police member who is conducting or supervising an investigation can file a complaint with the MPCC if they feel that a member of the Canadian Forces or a senior official from the Department of National Defence has interfered in this investigation or has tried to influence it. The MPCC has exclusive jurisdiction in processing interference complaints. The MPCC completes an initial review to determine if there is cause to proceed with an investigation, the scope of said investigation and the manner in which it is to be conducted. It then launches an investigation, if needed.
- Is there a time limit for filing a conduct or interference complaint?
- Normally, a conduct or interference complaint must be filed within the year following the incident. However, at the complainant’s request, the MPCC Chairperson can decide to extend this time limit if it is reasonable to do so, in light of the circumstances. The Chairperson’s decision on a request for an extension of the time to file a complaint is final, but may be brought before the Federal Court of Canada by way of an application for judicial review.
- How can a conduct or interference complaint be filed?
- Complaints can be submitted, in writing or orally, to the MPCC Chairperson, the Judge Advocate General or the Canadian Forces Provost Marshal. In the case of conduct complaints, they can also be submitted to a military police member.
Step 2 – Decision to conduct a public interest investigation
At any time and when it is in the public interest to do so, the MPCC Chairperson can launch a public interest investigation into a complaint regarding the conduct of a military police member or regarding interference in a police investigation, even if the complainant has withdrawn their complaint.
The MPCC’s enabling legislation does not specifically stipulate the factors that the Chairperson must take into account when exercising this statutory discretion in deciding to conduct a public interest investigation. The decision of whether the public interest would be served by causing the MPCC to conduct a public interest investigation is made on a case-by-case basis. Considerations taken into account in past decisions to conduct public interest investigations include:
- the inherent seriousness of the alleged conduct;
- the systemic issues raised in the complaint;
- the involvement of senior officials or military officers;
- the public interest in the issues related to the complaint;
- process considerations which suggest that it would be more fair, credible, coherent or efficient to deal with the complaint as a public interest case.
If the MPCC Chairperson decides to conduct a public interest investigation, she sends a substantiated written notice of the decision to the complainant, the subjects of the complaint, the Minister of National Defence, the Chief of the Defence Staff (in the case of an interference complaint against a member of the Military Police), the Deputy Minister of National Defence (in the case of an interference complaint against a Department of National Defence senior official), the Judge Advocate General and the Canadian Forces Provost Marshal. The MPCC Chairperson is not required to submit a substantiated written notice to the subject of the complaint if she is of the opinion that such a measure would negatively impact the public interest investigation.
In the case of a conduct complaint, the MPCC Chairperson’s decision to conduct a public interest investigation releases the Canadian Forces Provost Marshal from any obligation to investigate or produce a report on the complaint or to take any other measure in this regard, as long as it has not received the MPCC final report stating its findings and recommendations.
Step 3 – The MPCC investigates the complaint
Once the decision to conduct an investigation has been made, the MPCC follows these steps:
- At any time during the investigation, the MPCC Chairperson can decide to assign the public interest investigation file to one or more members of the MPCC or conduct the public interest investigation together with a member of the MPCC.
- When necessary, the MPCC conducts a preliminary investigation into the complaint and the associated files that the Military Police must provide to the MPCC in order to determine the scope of the public interest investigation and to identify all subjects of the complaint.
- One or more investigators are appointed and review all the evidence and other materials gathered on the complaint. This can consist of hundreds of pages of documents, emails, handwritten notes and reports and many hours of recorded audio and video from witnesses.
- The investigators prepare an investigation assessment report to be reviewed by the Chairperson or a delegated member of the MPCC. This investigation assessment report summarizes the available evidence, identifies the recommendations of the investigators regarding witnesses to be questioned and describes all additional investigation avenues that might be necessary in order to complete the complaint review. The investigation assessment report can also include estimates regarding timeframes and budget.
- Based on the investigation assessment report, the MPCC Chairperson or delegated member determines what witness interviews are required to adjudicate the complaint. The appointed investigators conduct the interviews.
- If the MPCC Chairperson or delegated member, based on the investigation assessment report, determines that additional documentation is needed to adjudicate the complaint, the MPCC prepares a document and information disclosure request. The additional information received following a disclosure request is summarized and compiled in an investigation report. Additional disclosure requests can be made each time the MPCC receives information indicating that other documents or information are necessary.
- The information gathered from witness interviews is summarized and compiled in an investigation report. Once all the additional information has been obtained and the investigation report has been completed to the satisfaction of the Chairperson or delegated member, the MPCC prepares an interim report.
Step 4 – The MPCC issues its interim report
The MPCC interim report includes a summary of the MPCC investigation, as well as its findings and recommendations. The interim report is sent to the Minister of National Defence, the Chief of the Defence Staff or Deputy Minister of National Defence (in the case of a complaint against a member of the Military Police or Department of National Defence senior official), Judge Advocate General and the Canadian Forces Provost Marshal.
Step 5 – The MPCC receives a notice of action
The notice of action is the Canadian Forces’ official response to the interim report. It describes the measures taken or planned, if applicable, to implement the MPCC’s recommendations. A refusal to take the measures to implement the MPCC’s findings and recommendations requires a substantiated notice to be submitted to the MPCC Chairperson and the Minister of National Defence.
In the case of a conduct complaint, the notice of action is received from the Canadian Forces Provost Marshal. In the case of an interference complaint, the notice of action is received from the Chief of the Defence Staff (if the subject of the complaint is a member of the Military Police) or the Deputy Minister of National Defence (if the subject of the complaint is a Department of National Defence senior official).
Step 6 – The MPCC prepares and publishes its final report
Taking into account the response given in the Canadian Forces notice of action, the MPCC prepares a final report of its findings and recommendations.
The final report is submitted to the Minister of National Defence, the Deputy Minister of National Defence, the Chief of the Defence Staff, the Judge Advocate General, the Canadian Forces Provost Marshal, the complainant and the subjects of the complaint.
The complete final report of the public interest investigation is also published on the MPCC’s website, subject to certain highly sensitive information that is redacted.
Frequently asked questions
Is participation in the public interest investigation mandatory?
No. Unlike a public interest hearing, participation in the public interest investigation process is voluntary. However, the cooperation of the witnesses and subjects of the complaint is crucial, given that the MPCC is an investigative body. It is therefore important that the MPCC have a complete understanding of all points of view regarding the facts before it can make a decision regarding the complaint.
The interview phase of the investigation is an opportunity for the MPCC to gather relevant information regarding the complaint from witnesses and the subjects of the complaint. It is also an opportunity for the subjects of the complaint and the witnesses to explain their role in the case and events based on their point of view.
Are witnesses and subjects of the complaint required to testify in public?
No. Unlike the process adopted for a public interest hearing, the public interest investigation does not include a public hearing for receiving testimony. The interviews with witnesses and subjects of the complaint as part of a public interest investigation are conducted in private by MPCC investigators. The witnesses and subjects of the complaint can have someone they trust with them during the interview, if they so desire.
On what basis are the subjects of the complaint named?
The subjects of the complaint filed with the MPCC are named based solely on their participation in the task or conduct that is the subject of the complaint. For example, if a complaint alleges that an investigation was inadequate, the military police members involved will be named as the subjects of the complaint, even if no information confirming that the investigation was indeed inadequate was obtained.
What does it mean to be named as the subject of a complaint in a public interest investigation?
The status of subjects of the complaint only means that the conduct of these individuals is being questioned in a complaint being reviewed by the MPCC. This does not mean that the MPCC has concluded or has reasons to believe that the conduct of the individuals in question was deficient.
Subjects of the complaint differ from someone accused in a criminal case. The latter, although presumed innocent, has been charged because the Crown has grounds to believe they were involved in a crime. The subjects of the complaint as part of an investigation being conducted by the MPCC are in a different situation. They have not been named because the MPCC believes they participated in inappropriate conduct or that their work was deficient.
During the course of the public interest investigation, the subjects of the complaint have the opportunity to meet with MPCC investigators to explain their version of the facts and their role in the case. An interview with the MPCC is an opportunity for the subjects of the complaint to provide information to the MPCC that often no one else can provide. It is crucial in helping the MPCC gain a complete understanding of what really happened.
Subjects of the complaint will be informed in writing no later than 60 days after receiving the complaint, and subsequently, every 30 days, regarding the progress being made in the case until it has been concluded. They will also receive a copy of the MPCC’s final report, which sets out its findings and recommendations.
Can a decision made by the MPCC in a public interest investigation be appealed?
MPCC decisions are final. It is therefore not possible to appeal a MPCC decision made in a public interest investigation. However, under the Federal Courts Act, an individual who is directly impacted by a decision can file an application for judicial review before the Federal Court of Canada within 30 days of receiving the decision or within any other timeframe that the Federal Court may authorize upon request.
How is the public kept informed of the progress being made in a public interest investigation?
The MPCC has a section on its website where information pertaining to ongoing public interest investigations is updated, if applicable.
The final reports for public interest investigations that the MPCC has investigated are also available online.
For more information on public interest investigations:
Address:
Military Police Complaints Commission of Canada
270 Albert Street, 10th Floor
Ottawa, ON K1P 5G8
Telephone: 613-947-5625 or 1-800-632-0566 (toll free)
Email: commission@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca
- Date modified: